Rural women, care and agrochemicals: A Call for Action 

In rural communities worldwide, women are the backbone of food production and care. However, they are also on the frontlines of a growing health and environmental crisis caused by the widespread use of agrochemicals. Pesticides and synthetic fertilizers, central to the industrial corporate food system and production model, play a central role in the triple planetary crises: the intensification of climate change, the degradation of ecosystems and loss of biodiversity, and environmental pollution.  

Our new briefing paper Rural women, care and agrochemicals shows that women face exposure in every dimension of life. In Ecuador’s banana and floriculture industries, women work amid fumigation and chemical residues, often without protection. Many bring pesticide-use practices into family greenhouses near their homes, extending contamination into the domestic sphere. Women are exposed to toxics during care work, when they are washing contaminated clothes, preparing food, and fetching water. Toxics also increase their already heavy care work when they nurse sick family members. 

We are in a constant struggle. We seek to produce food that is healthy and agrodiverse […] bananas, cocoa, cassava, coffee, citrus fruits, avocados […]. However, in our surroundings […] we find large areas of banana monocultures. Through fumigation, using light aircraft or drones, extensive production contaminates nature, our production and ourselves.” Evelyn Yánez and Daisy Chávez, rural woman from Ecuador. 

Care as resistance and transformation 

Despite these injustices, rural women are building transformative alternatives rooted in care. They are leading the resistance against a food system centred on extraction and pollution that accumulates wealth in the hands of a few while externalising harms to communities and the environment. In Ecuador, the Rural Women’s Network has embarked on an agroecological transition that includes diversified production, seed protection, women-led agroecology schools, territorial food reserves free of agrochemicals, and community markets. 

Similarly, in Honduras, women fishers are defending their coastal territories, which are being polluted and privatized by industrial shrimp farming. The destruction of mangroves and marine biodiversity has made it increasingly difficult for these women to feed their families or make a living while compounding the impacts of climate change on coastal communities. Yet, they continue to take care of the marine ecosystems and their communities, demanding co-governance of marine resources, restoring mangroves and advocating for sustainable fishing practices.  

“We are full of shrimp laboratories; they took our beaches and left us only rubble and pollution. They did not fulfil their promises to provide employment for the community.” Leader of the Cedeño community. 

These efforts are not only about ensuring food security; they are about reclaiming control over the natural resources that sustain life and over the way food is produced and families are fed. By embracing agroecology, women are showing that care within food systems, care for the land, water, and forests, and communities, is a key force for social and environmental justice. They are advocating for ways of producing, collecting and exchanging food that are based on care and solidarity, not on toxic inputs and corporate greed. 

The challenges rural women face are compounded by gender inequalities. While they provide most of the unpaid care work, they receive little to no support from the state, and their work is often undervalued and invisibilized. As noted by Marcos Orellana, UN Special Rapporteur on Toxic Substances and Human Rights, women face a “double injustice”—they are responsible for shielding their families from invisible toxics but are often denied the resources and information necessary to protect themselves and their communities. 

Rural women’s leadership and transformative practices offer a roadmap for a just and toxic-free world. To support and amplify their efforts it is essential that states: 

  • Recognize food care as essential: Acknowledge the critical role of women’s care work in sustaining life and food systems. 
  • Redistribute care responsibilities: Implement policies that share care work equitably across families, communities, and the state.. 
  • Support agroecology: Invest in sustainable, women-led agroecological practices, providing training, resources, and market access. 
  • Enforce protective measures: Enact strong, gender-responsive regulations to protect rural women from agrochemicals and other toxic substances. 

If we are serious about just, healthy, and sustainable food systems, we must place care—and the women who provide it—at the center of policy and action. Protecting their rights is not only a matter of justice; it is essential for the future of food and the health of our planet. 

Panama: Fishers highlight rights violations at UN

The government of Panama has successively cut off access to traditional fishing grounds of the Ngäbe Buglé people since 2010, promising compensation in the form of social programs and food aid which never materialized. Some closures of fishing grounds have been linked to the state’s efforts to meet the global 30×30 conservation goal. Resistance from fishers has been met with violent repression, including the deaths of several leaders.

The Ngäbe Buglé now only have access to one fishing ground in Escudo de Veraguas. Earlier this year, the government informed them and Ño Kribo communities that it is also considering a ban there, claiming it was needed to replenish fish stocks.

“The ban threatens our customary fishing rights, our right to food and food sovereignty, and our cultural survival, and it has been enforced with deadly repression,” Alfonso Simon Raylan, a Ngäbe Buglé fisher leader and Secretary General of Sindicato de Trabajadores del Mar (SITRAMAR) told the Human Rights Council in a statement today.

His organization, SITRAMAR, is a member of the World Forum of Fisher Peoples, a global movement representing 10 million traditional and artisanal fisher peoples and harvesters. Their visit to Geneva is supported by FIAN International.

Fishing bans reflect the structural discrimination and marginalization that fisher peoples and Indigenous Peoples have faced historically and continue to endure today. The Ngäbe Buglé – much like other Indigenous Peoples in the region and around the world – have practiced ancestral fishing for subsistence for generations. They have nourished their communities for centuries in harmony with nature, using only fishing rods, small traps, or traditional “lung fishing” methods to catch fish and lobster.

Fortress conservation

“30×30 is not about conservation, it is about exclusion. States, in partnership with corporates and big conservation NGOs are promoting a fortress conservation model that criminalizes our people, justifies bans and closure of their territories, while leaving industrial polluters untouched,” said Herman Kumara, General Secretary of the World Forum of Fisher Peoples (WFFP).

“True conservation must start from the knowledge and practices of those who have lived in balance with nature for generations.”

Both the fishing ban and Panama’s Law 462, passed in March of this year, have triggered widespread food and resource shortages, alongside violent crackdowns.

“For our communities, who have sustainably fished with seasonal closures for centuries, this is not conservation – it is persecution,” added Alfonso Simon Raylan.

Brutal violence

The law further limits access to social security and medical care, worsening economic insecurity. Since its passage, there have been mass protests. As recently pointed out by UN Special Rapporteurs, peaceful indigenous protesters and their allies, have allegedly been met with disproportionate force and brutal violence by armed military police for simply exercising their human right to protest.

Several community leaders, including three members of Alfonso Simon Raylan’s family, have been killed.

Denying Indigenous Peoples access to their traditional fishing grounds and banning fishing, their only source of livelihood, undermines their human rights – including the right to food and nutrition and the right to land and natural resources – enshrined in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). It also violates the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas (UNDROP). Both affirm the rights of Indigenous Peoples to self-determination, free, prior and informed consent, as well as access to their traditional territories and the survival of their culture. Panama, as a state party to ICESCR has binding obligations to respect, protect, and fulfil these rights.

Carlos Duarte, Chair-Rapporteur of the UN Working Group on UNDROP, said that fishers have often been overlooked in policy making.

“Their water territories have not normally been recognized, even though their habitats and their harvests are ancestral,” he noted, adding that the next report of the group will be on issue of territoriality.

“We hope that we can continue working to recognize these water territories and the vital relationship between fishers and nature.”

FIAN International stands in solidarity with the Ngäbe Buglé, SITRAMAR, and WFFP, calling on Panama to respect Indigenous Peoples’ human rights, withdraw the fishing ban, repeal Law 462 and end violent crackdowns on peaceful protests. FIAN International also calls on Panama to take adequate measures to ensure that Indigenous fishers can meaningfully participate in all policy processes affecting their livelihoods.

For more information or media interviews please contact Yifang Slot-Tang Slot-Tang@fian.org or Tom Sullivan sullivan@fian.org