Solidarity not exploitation: we stand with food workers from farm to table

At the beginning of May, on International Workers’ Day, we celebrate the strength and sacrifices of workers all over the world. But there are workers who are persistently overlooked – the millions who labour to produce, process and serve people their food, most of whom are in the informal economy – who we focus on in this edition of Supermarket Watch.

Whether we are talking about peasant farmers in Peru, street vendors in Zimbabwe or gig workers delivering food in India, workers across the food system – in production, processing, distribution or preparation – are essential for bringing food to people's tables and yet they remain among the most exploited workers in the world.

 
Peasants and landless farmers are often forcefully removed from ancestral lands by industrial agriculture or pushed out due to climate change and eco-destruction and must struggle to survive. Many migrate to become underpaid and undocumented workers in the agriculture industry of wealthier countries. These are the unseen workers who pick fruits, harvest vegetables, and pack meats for far away consumers — often with no healthcare, legal protection, or right to unionise.
 
In cities, street and market vendors, many of whom are women, face harassment and violence on a daily basis. They provide nutritious and accessible food to low-income communities but are still not recognised as workers providing essential services and typically have no access to any social protections.
 
Then we have the food delivery workers, dependent on a platform economy governed by algorithms that promises freedom and efficiency but only offers them insecurity, arbitrary penalties and meagre pay.
 
Food connects us all, but the people producing and supplying it are often rendered invisible. Their labour is considered “unskilled,” their struggles are ignored, and their organising is suppressed. In the month when we celebrate International Workers’ Day, we must own up to the human cost of our increasingly corporatised, exploitative and profoundly unequal food system. Every meal is made possible by workers whose rights — to rest, to organise, to live with dignity — are too often denied. The vast majority of food workers in the global South, and many in the global North, don't have access to basic social protections. With retirement pensions, for instance, after decades of hard work, farmers, fishers, farmworkers and food vendors across nearly the entire global South are either completely without a pension or only get paid a pittance.
 
Food sovereignty cannot be dissociated from labour justice. That means fair wages, healthy and safe working conditions, social protection and collective bargaining. For the millions of workers in the informal economy, it also means ensuring their rights to full legal and social protections and participation in policy-making. This is possible to do, and, for instance, there are examples out there already of global South countries where governments, usually pushed by strong social movements, have enacted public pension systems designed to provide a dignified retirement for small farmers and their families. At the upcoming 113th International Labour Conference in Geneva, governments, workers and employers the world over will be discussing labour standards for both those in the informal economy and those in the platform economy. It is crucial that the needs and interests of food workers, in all their diversity, are front-and-centre in these discussions. 
 
Let's fight together for a food system rooted in solidarity, not exploitation!
 
Read the latest issue here.
 
For more information contact Laura Michéle michele@fian.org
 

CEDAW Sri Lanka: Government must ensure equal rights to land, natural resources and decision making

Rural women, including peasants, fish workers, plantation workers  and other small-scale food producers make up more than 50 percent of all food production in Sri Lanka. However, they are facing significant challenges, including access to land and other natural resources, financial support and participation in governance and decision making.

They continue to face marginalization without legitimate membership-based organizations to access resources, services, and welfare benefits. There is limited attention to their welfare in social security programs, and their rights of association and access to fair markets remain limited. This situation is further aggravated by environmental marine pollution, climate change and the extensive use of agro-toxics in the country.

These and other issues were highlighted in a parallel report by a collective of grassroots organizations including FIAN Sri Lanka and the National Fisheries Solidarity (NAFSO), engaged in advocacy during the review of Sri Lanka by the CEDAW Committee in February 2025.

“Fisherwomen’s concerns are overlooked, and gender-sensitive policies in the sector are lacking,” says NAFSO’s Chandra Kanthi Abeykoon, who represented the CSO collective during the CEDAW review in Geneva.

“The contribution of women to food production is not valued adequately. They are hardly involved in decision-making about the food production process and not recognized legally as members in cooperatives.”

The CEDAW review of Sri Lanka made a series of recommendations to the government including the adoption of a national action plan on rural women and girls, adequate access to income-generating opportunities, social benefits and health care. It also called for them to be equally represented in decision-making processes, including on rural development programmes.

The CSO collective will closely monitor how the government follows up the recommendations, according to Thilak Kariyawasam, Executive Director of FIAN Sri Lanka.

“We will continue our advocacy towards the development of a comprehensive national strategy on agriculture and food security for all, with a view towards a transition to agro-ecology including binding transition plans that include gender-sensitive support mechanisms for rural populations and Indigenous Peoples, in line with UNDRIP, UNDROP, CEDAW and ILO conventions,” he added.

In Sri Lanka, around 1.1 million people are undernourished and more than half of the population (approx. 12.3 million people) cannot afford a healthy diet. Around 15 percent of children under the age of five suffer from acute malnutrition. Malnutrition among children of tea plantation workers is more than twice as high as in urban areas. Climate change also threatens the right to food, especially for poorer people.

For more information, please contact Sabine Pabst pabst@fian.org

FAO, states must defend fishers’ human rights, close gates to corporations

Amid the celebration of the World Fisheries Day, FIAN International is calling on states comprising the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) to not just recognize the efforts of at least 35 million small-scale fishers – the source of more than half of the world’s fish catch – but also genuinely listen to their needs and aspirations and work with them towards nourishing the world without compromising their human rights.

FIAN laments that while the FAO has time and again underscored the major role of small-scale fishers and fish workers in eradicating hunger and poverty by supporting the livelihoods of over 120 million people across the globe, its commitment to support them are being weakened by its pronouncements and actions that either lean towards corporate interests or open wider opportunities for corporations to further interfere with the affairs of small-scale fishers. 

FAO Director General Director-General Qu Dongyu released a statement during the September 2021 Global Conference on Aquaculture Millenium+20 in Shanghai that aquaculture is key to meet increasing food demand.

While he stressed during the event that the benefits from the growth of aquaculture “must be equitable and fairly distributed,” the FAO chief was vague on what type or scale of aquaculture he was referring to.

Aquaculture is diverse. However, this diversity isn’t captured in the definition used by the FAO, which includes both “individual and corporate ownership”.

And if the FAO chief was suggesting during his speech that it was the large-scale industrial aquaculture that needed to be equitable and fair, this would be next to impossible because the industry remains incorrigibly exploitative, destructive, and profit-hungry.

In fact, Mr. Qu delivered his speech before a bevy of fellow speakers and panelists, many of whom were working for or linked to corporate aquaculture operators, establishments, and trade organizations. 

FIAN is also wary of the FAO’s inclusion of corporate-friendly actors in the international steering committee of the 2022 International Year of Artisanal Fisheries and Aquaculture (IYAFA) that was recently launched by the FAO in time for the Nov. 21 World Fisheries Day. 

With IYAFA’s vision of fully recognizing and empowering small-scale fishers to continue their contributions to poverty alleviation, human well-being, and resilient and sustainable food systems, it was surprising that opposing bedfellows have become part of the IYAFA. On one side are small-scale fishers and on the other are representatives and allies of the corporate fisheries sector often being blamed as the cause of the former’s marginalization and exploitation. 

The corporate capture of fisheries through the UN and the FAO is also happening through the UN Food Systems Summit (UNFSS).

Following the UNFSS last September, at least 25 multi-stakeholder coalitions were created to supposedly find solutions to hunger and malnutrition in line with the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

Among these is the Coalition for Aquatic/Blue Foods whose main objective is to “realize the full potential of sustainable blue or aquatic foods – such as fish, shellfish…plants and algae, captured or cultivated in freshwater or marine ecosystems.”

The UNFSS noted that this coalition would support FAO in its work on fisheries and aquaculture in relation to the 2022 IYAFA. 

A closer look at the composition of this coalition reveals excessive corporate influence. 

For instance, among its networks, the Blue Food Assessment, an international joint initiative comprising scientists,” is funded by the Walton Family, the founder of US-based multinational retail corporation Walmart

Another network of the coalition is the Mava Foundation whose president, Andre Hoffman, is vice president of Swiss multinational healthcare firm Roche Holding AG, which sells drugs and feed additives for aquaculture.    

Even before these UN and FAO-facilitated partnerships, corporate control of fisheries had already wreaked havoc on the lives and livelihoods of small-scale fishers and their environment, particularly in Asia where 90% of them reside

In India's Chilika Lake, the world’s largest brackish water lagoon, intensive shrimp farming has devastated the livelihoods of small-scale fishers. Their catch has dwindled because the aquatic life in the lagoon is being killed by chemical-laced water discharges from shrimp ponds. 

In Thailand, incomes of small fishers have drastically dropped as corporate expansion of  mussel farms in Ban Don Bay, which has already encroached on the sea, blocked their access to coastal marine resources.

In Sri Lanka’s Jaffna District, hundreds of small-scale fishers and their families are complaining of hunger as they could no longer enter vast coastal and sea areas that have been reserved for shrimp farming. 

With these injustices happening now, it should not be difficult for the FAO and the 197 states comprising it to see how the institution, especially with its recent pronouncements and actions, could eventually become an instrument to shut down the human rights of small-scale fishers. 

If the FAO and governments around the world truly want to help end the marginalization of small-scale fishers and their suffering from unequal power relations, they must stop keeping their gates open to corporate interference. 

Governments and the FAO can do this by leading the way in implementing the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines, which identified industrial aquaculture and other large-scale fishing operations, along with destructive developments in tourism, mining, energy and agriculture, as the ones competing with the political and economic interests of small-scale fisheries and abusing the latter’s human rights. 

Small-scale fisher movements had a key role in elaborating the guidelines. It is through these guidelines that they will be able to govern themselves and become real agents for the transformation of local food systems to ensure the health of our planet and our people.

READ RELATED STATEMENTS: 

IPC Statement on World Fisheries Day 

Governments must reject corporations’ for-profit hunger solutionsGovernments must reject corporations’ for-profit hunger solutions

 

Sri Lanka: Harrassment and Threats of Human Rights Defender Herman Kumara

Olivier De Schutter
UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food
Université de Louvain
Collège Thomas More
1348 Louvain-la-Neuve
Belgium

Heidelberg (Germany), 16 March 2012

Honourable Sir,

Foodfirst Information and Action Network (FIAN) is an international human rights organization working for the worldwide implementation of the human right to food and in consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations (ECOSOC).

We have noted with great concern the case of Mr. Herman Kumara of Sandalankawa, Irabadagama in Kurunegalle District, who is being harassed, threatened and fears an imminent abduction.

FIAN has been associated with Mr. Kumara in his capacity as the head of the National Fisheries Solidarity Movement (NFSM) of Sri Lanka and also as the former Secretary General of the World Forum of Fisher People (WFFP). We know him as an honorable person working for the rights of small-scale fish workers. He has worked tirelessly to gain recognition and respect for the human right to food as well as other human rights of men and women from fishing communities, both in Sri Lanka and globally.

We understand that the threats are due to Mr. Kumara’s work as a human rights defender and his campaigns for fish workers’ rights and the rights of internally displaced persons in Sri Lanka due to war and development projects. We further understand that the threats increased after protests by fishermen against recent fuel price hikes in Sri Lanka. Such price increases have severe consequences for the realization of the human right to food of small scale fishermen and their families. Sri Lanka is a state party to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and therefore obliged to respect, protect and fulfil the human right to adequate food and, in general, the human right to an adequate standard of living (Art. 11 ICESCR).

Mr. Kumara states that these mobilizations were organized by the fishermen themselves and that while he has campaigned for fishermen’s rights, he and his organization were not involved in the organization of these protests. However, Mr Kumara and NFSM did express their support for and solidarity with the protesting fishermen.

It has been reported that, in the ensuing violence, one fisherman was killed and several others injured by the shooting and clashes with the police. We abhor such violence and add our voice to that of Mr Kumara and NFSM in condemning it and calling for a peaceful dialogue towards settlement of the problem. Whilst the issue of fuel price increases is a matter for the National Government of Sri Lanka to resolve, we are keen to be assured that the personal safety of Mr. Kumara and his family and that the human rights of the fishing communities will be guaranteed in such a process.

We have been informed that to date there has been no credible attempt to investigate the police complaint by Mr. Kumara and his wife regarding the surveillance and threats against him. Also, to the best of our knowledge, no steps have been taken to ensure Mr. Kumara’s protection.

We hope that Mr Herman Kumara’s case will be properly looked into and addressed through the correct legal channels, in a non-discriminatory manner, and through the due process of law.

Please keep me informed of the action you plan to take in this regard.

Yours sincerely,

Dr. Flavio Luiz Schieck Valente

Secretary General

FIAN International

cc.

N K Illangakoon Inspector General of Police

Ms. Eva Wanasundara, Attorney General

Secretary National Police Commission

Secretary Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission

UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders, Margaret Sekaggya

Sri Lanka: Highway Construction Threatens the Livelihood of around 20,000 people in 170 villages in Sri Lanka

Since 1999 the Government of Sri Lanka with the support of ADB (Asian Development Bank) and JBIC (Japan Bank for International Cooperation) has been implementing ”The Southern Transport Development Project”, to develop and build a limited access expressway linking the outskirts of the capital, Colombo, to Matara in the south. The planned highway will pass through villages and the adjacent agricultural areas, including coconut, tea and rubber estates. Many houses and around 1000 hectares of agricultural land will be destroyed. The villagers are presently working as labourers in the paddy fields and estates and are also growing food in their own plot of land. With the construction of the highway the villagers will lose their ability to feed themselves due to loss of land and work. They will also lose their access to safe drinking water.

International action is urgently needed to put pressure on the Sri Lankan Government to change the plan of the project and provide fair and just compensation. So far no proper compensation has been given to the families already displaced. Please write polite letters to Prime Minister of Sri Lanka and to the President of Sri Lanka to ensure that the Right to Food and the Right to Water are respected and protectedand protected

Sri Lanka: Deep Sea Fishing Policy Threatens the Livelihood of One Million Fisher folk

The Sri Lankan government’s National Fishery policy for Deep Sea permits foreign fishing vessels to fish in Sri Lanka’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ – 200 nautical miles). Such fishing threatens the livelihood of approximately one million local small scale fisher folks who also fish in this zone and sell their catch on the local markets. Furthermore, since the foreign deep sea fishing depletes the sea and eighty percent of the catch is meant for export, fish prices in local markets will increase and be inaccessible and unaffordable to the Sri Lankans. Fish has been a cheap source of protein, easily available and affordable to most people.

The Sri Lankan government has failed in its duty to respect and protect the fisher folk and the population’s right to feed themselves. An international action is urgently needed to protect the right to food of the coastal population of Sri Lanka including the fisher folk. Otherwise they will face malnutrition. Please write polite letters to the President of the Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka, with a copy to the Ministry of Fisheries and Ocean resources, requesting them to remove all licences to foreign fishing vessels from Sri Lankan waters.