France and Spain must regulate their companies in Senegal

Senegalese authorities have dispossessed hundreds of farmers in Western Senegal to make way for phosphate mining and mineral extraction by Spanish-Senegalese firm SEPHOS and French-Senegalese company Grande Côte Opérations (GCO).

These companies – and the authorities which granted them permits to extract phosphate, zircon, ilmenite and other minerals – have infringed the human rights of local communities in Koudiadiène, Lam-Lam, Pambal as well as in Diogo and surrounding areas, including the right to adequate food and nutrition, the right to land, the right to a healthy, clean and sustainable environment, the right to health and the right to water, according to a new report from FIAN International (English summary – full report in French here).

Although most communities in rural Senegal have access to land according to traditional customary rights, rather than formal land titles, the report highlights a lack of legal recognition of the practice. This leaves peasants and rural communities unprotected when authorities grant mining concessions to domestic or foreign companies.

“Koudiadiène is in the phosphate mining reserve. This material is under our feet and if the state needs it, the population will have to move,” lamented one Koudiadiène community member.  

Moreover, the level of compensation offered for the loss of land has been derisory or non-existent  pushing many affected people into extreme poverty

“Before, we were comfortable and had enough to eat. The women helped with the agricultural tasks. The income from the crops enabled us to eat well and cover all our other expenses. Since our field has been grabbed, I don't work and stay at home,” said Ndeye Ndiaye, a victim of land grabbing from Diogo

“My children don't have enough to eat. I often ask the neighbors for money to pay for the children's medical care. We are tired. We need help,” she added.

The affected communities were not informed about the mining operations in advance, despite the devastating impact it has since had on their crops and health.

“Peasants are not even notified in time of the machines' intervention on their fields … community members with fields close to the mine have lost everything because of the dust that settles on their crops,” explained Armand Gondet Dione, a human rights defender from Pambal.

“The fields have become unfit for cultivation. Trees have dried up and died before they could even be inventoried. Grazing areas are disappearing, flora and fauna are dying, drought and erosion are worsening.”

Both SEPHOS, which is engaged in phosphate mining and GCO, which extracts zircon, ilmenite, rutile and leucoxene have parent companies or main assets respectively in Spain and France.

While Senegal has clearly infringed its obligations under international human rights law and domestic laws, Spain and France are also obliged according to international human rights law to take steps to ensure that mining companies based on their territory do not undermine the right to food and other related rights in Senegal. This obligation also requires states to sanction these actors in the event of abuse, and to provide recourse to those affected by these companies, notably through their national courts and adequate remedies.

Spain and France must take responsibility for the lives destroyed by their companies and take action without delay.

Read the full report in French here.

The report will soon be available in Spanish.

In English, you can access here the report’s key messages, recommendations, and a graph illustrating one case of derisory compensation.

For more information, please contact Valentin Hategekimana hategekimana@fian.org or Tom Sullivan sullivan@fian.org

 

 

Transforming food systems from the bottom-up: local food policies and public participation in Europe

The CRESS project is a collective effort by FIAN International, FIAN Austria, FIAN Belgium, FIAN Portugal, Observatori DESCA (Spain), and (the former) FIAN Sweden, funded by the EU. 

In recent years there has been an increase across Europe in local government policies and initiatives around food (systems) and nutrition. This has been accompanied and driven by the emergence of participatory spaces, including food policy councils, that engage communities in food policy making at the local level.

The project examines concrete policies and initiatives by local and regional governments and spaces of community participation in six European countries: Austria, Belgium, Germany, Portugal, Spain and Sweden. The project examined areas of engagement and constraints faced by local governments, as well as the transformative character (from a human rights perspective) of the policies and initiatives put forward.

Moreover, a central emphasis of the project was to understand how participation is organised across the different countries and localities: which structures are in place and what influence do they hold, who participates and who remains at the margins, how are power relations and conflicts of interest addressed?

Project outcomes are presented in three outcomes: (1) a mapping that summarizes the situation for each of the six countries and draws some general reflections, (2) an interactive map that provides more detail on the cases reviewed and (3) a toolkit that seeks to create greater understanding of how to operationalise human rights based local policy making, including impacts at the level of the EU.

Findings from the mapping point to important steps being taken at the local level to re-localize food systems and make them more healthy, sustainable, and just. There is an increased recognition by local governments of the role they can play and multiple strategies and initiatives covering critical areas of intervention from communal catering and public procurement, to support for ecological production and local markets, to changes in land use criteria. At the same time, local government is constrained by a number of internal and external factors including a lack of human and financial resources, and EU policies which hinder regionalisation.  

The project’s findings also reflect the immense diversity that exists across Europe – and within countries – with regard to structures of community participation. They highlight the critical relevance of such spaces, and community mobilization, for putting food on the agenda of local governments and pushing for transformative, bottom-up food systems changes. At the same time, and despite many efforts, important challenges and limitations remain, especially with regard to including marginalised groups within these spaces and enabling their voices to be heard. 

The toolkit aims to foster a more comprehensive human rights approach to addressing food system challenges from the bottom-up and promoting inclusive governance structures. It aims to contribute to our collective understanding of strategically engaging with food systems at the local level in Europe and fostering strategies to ensure stronger bottom-up governance at the European Union (EU) level. It explores the potential for multi-level architecture of food systems policies and governance structures and examines how regional policies impact local policymaking.

The mapping, interactive map and toolkit are also available in other languages:

Mapping: French, German, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish

Interactive map: French, German, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish

Toolkit: French, German, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish

For more information please contact Emily Mattheisen: mattheisen@fian.org or Laura Michéle: michele@fian.org

Transitioning towards Pesticide-free food systems: People’s Struggles and Imagination

Pesticides are causing a global human rights and environmental catastrophe. They are
responsible for an estimated 200,000 acute poisoning deaths each year. Long-term
exposure can lead to chronic diagnoses like cancer; birth defects and reproductive
harm; and abnormalities in the neurological, developmental, and immune systems.
Runoff from pesticides applied to crops frequently pollutes the surrounding ecosystem
and beyond, with deleterious ecological consequences that exacerbate the loss
of biodiversity. Pesticides can also harm the biodiversity of soils, which can lead to
large declines in crop yields, posing problems for food security.

FIAN’s study investigates how countries are transitioning to agroecology and pesticide-
free food systems. By examining cases in India, Brazil, Argentina, France, Spain,
Italy, and the United States (US), FIAN’s study offers a clear diagnosis of the human
rights and environmental problems resulting from pesticides.

It provides a foundation for grassroots movements, local and state governments,
and the international community to create pesticide-free societies that can uphold
the right to a toxic-free environment for all.

Read and download the Study Transitioning towards Pesticide-free food systems: People's Struggles and Imagination

See also  Key Elements in Regulatory Frameworks to Ban Highly Hazardous Pesticides, Phase Out Other Pesticides, and Facilitate the Transition to Agroecology

See also the report Pesticides in Latin America: Violations Against the Right to Adequate Food and Nutrition

Madrid World Food Conference: FIAN demands policy revision instead of lip service

He will take part in a roundtable with FAO Director-General Jacques Diouf, Josette Sheeran, Director of the World Food Programme, and EU Commissioner for Development and Humanitarian Aid, Louis Michel.

UN Secretary General, Ban Ki-Moon and the Spanish Prime Minister, Rodriguez Zapatero invited Governments from all over the world to the High Level Meeting on Food Security for All. In their public announcement they explained that the human right to food would serve as starting point for the meeting and the resulting strategies. The official goal of the summit is to produce a “timetable for the elimination of hunger and food security for all”. At the suggestion of the G8 a “Global Partnership for Agriculture and Food Security” will be initiated, which should coordinate the efforts to fight hunger.

“The human right to food must be the guiding principle of the international road map to fight hunger, says Flavio Valente, “The hungry are mostly small-scale farmers, agricultural laborers, indigenous people, and inhabitants of slums who are systematically discriminated against in trade, agricultural, social and development policies.

The human right to food imposes clear obligations on States and international organizations in order to stop such discrimination. A reformed international food and agriculture architecture must, above all, grant those disadvantaged populations more opportunities to participate and more mechanisms for complaint.