DRC must protect South Kivu communities impacted by Chinese mining and logging

Four Congolese civil society groups submitted a Universal Periodic Review (UPR) parallel report to the UN Human Rights Council today highlighting human rights abuses linked to mining and illegal logging by Oriental Resources Congo, Congo Blueant Minéral, BM Global Business, Yellow Water Ressources, New Oriental Mineral and Regal Mining.

The Chinese companies’ activities are fueling land grabbing, pollution and the forced eviction of communities in the Wamuzimu chiefdom in Mwenga territory, South Kivu – a region long affected by protracted armed conflict. The communities have been subjected to multiple human rights abuses affecting their right to food and nutrition, right to land, right to health and right to work, to name a few.

Congolese civil society groups – including Front Commun pour la Protection de l’Environnement et des Espaces Protégés, Association des Mamans Tonde-Tonde, Association des Femmes et Écologie and Société Civile Environnementale du Congo – denounce the weak response and corrupt practices of DRC authorities which have allowed the Chinese companies to plunder the country, at the expense of local communities.

“The companies must compensate families whose land they have plundered in complicity with customary chiefs and provincial and national authorities,” said one community member, who wished to remain anonymous for security reasons.

“They should build wells in all the areas where they have polluted river water so that households can have high-quality water … and protect children from water-borne diseases.”

Many in the affected communities have lost their livelihoods and call on the DRC government to address the human rights abuses caused by the Chinese companies. These have occurred in complicity with Congolese authorities at all levels who have failed to comply with their human rights obligations.

“The Congolese government must ensure that the rights of those affected by the six Chinese companies are restored. It must also ensure that the companies are regulated and hold accountable those involved in human rights violations and abuses,” says Valentin Hategekimana, Africa Coordinator at FIAN International.

The actions of these companies compound an existing emergency in the DRC, which has the highest number of people in the world facing acute food insecurity in hunger hotspots, according the UN Food and Agriculture Organization.

Read the full UPR parallel report on the DRC in French here.

For more information, please contact Tom Sullivan sullivan@fian.org or Clara Roig Medina  roig@fian.org

Public development banks must stop funding corporate agribusiness

There is little to suggest that the Finance in Common summit with over 450 PDBs will be any different, not least because of the failure of last year’s summit to embrace a human rights or community-led approach, but also because of longstanding human rights issues with these publically owned banks.

On the eve of the summit which will take place in Rome, FIAN International, alongside 280 other civil-society organizations and social movements, calls on governments to put an end to state-backed financial support to agribusiness companies and projects that take land, natural resources and livelihoods from local communities.

Poor track record

Public development banks are state-mandated, largely state-funded and state-controlled financial institutions that finance activities that should contribute to the improvement of people's lives, particularly in the Global South. They account for over US$2 trillion a year in financing to public and private companies for things like roads, power plants and agribusiness plantations. An estimated US$1.4 trillion goes to the agriculture and food sector.

Many PDBs have a poor track record when it comes to transparency and investments that benefit agribusiness corporations at the expense of farmers, herders, fishers, food workers and Indigenous Peoples, undermining their food sovereignty, ecosystems and human rights. They have a heavy legacy of investing in companies involved in land grabbing, corruption, violence, environmental destruction and other severe human rights violations.

Their increasing use of offshore private equity funds and complex investment webs –including financial intermediaries – to channel investments makes it very difficult to scrutinise them, as highlighted by recent revelations surrounding German development finance institution Deutsche Investitions– und Entwicklungsgesellschaft (DEG).

Linked to human rights violations

DEG, a subsidiary of Germany’s largest state-owned development bank Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW), provides billions of euros in development finance to Latin America, Asia and Africa.

FIAN Germany has monitored human violations related to investments of these banks for many years, despite major challenges with the banks’ lack of transparency. More than half of the DEG’s annual funding is channelled through financial intermediaries and other banks and funds.

Not even the German government has a clear picture of where this money hits the ground and its real impact. This makes it nearly impossible to force the banks to comply with Germany’s human rights obligations. In cases where FIAN could identify concrete investments in agribusinesses, there was also evidence of human rights violations.

In Zambia, for example, DEG continues to provide the country’s biggest agribusiness Zambeef with tens of millions of US Dollars although FIAN has documented cases of forced evictions involving Zambeef as far back as 2013. In Paraguay, DEG is co-owner of the country’s second largest landowner Paraguay Agricultural Corporation PAYCO, which buys up land on a large scale, including traditional indigenous settlements, for massive agro-industrial projects that make intensive use of pesticides.

“Those cases are emblematic of DEGs investment preferences for large-scale industrial agribusiness which foreclose instead of supporting or promoting equitable, people-centered and sustainable development rooted in the right to food,” said Roman Herre, FIAN Germany policy advisor for land and agriculture.

Unaccountable

A decision by the Belgium’s public development bank, Belgian Investment Company for Developing Countries (BIO), together with other European and North American PDBs to support palm oil production by Feronia PHC in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) – despite the violent repression of locally community activists – is a another example.

“Although the demands of the communities affected were relayed to the bank, there was no recourse to justice, no way to hold the bank accountable,” said Florence Kroff, coordinator of FIAN Belgium.

“Even before the decision to finance this project, we raised questions about the risks of human rights violations involved in supporting this agribusiness in the DRC, thanks to an ill-gotten concession on more than 100,000 ha of land, a legacy of the colonial era,” she added.

“In addition to environmental pollution and indecent working conditions on the plantations, Belgian – as well as German, French, Dutch and other – public money is contributing to a climate of violent criminalisation in the region, which has already led to dozens of arbitrary arrests and detentions and the deaths of several land activists.”

It is time to hold public development banks, and the governments controlling them, accountable for the human rights violations that they are fuelling and to stop all future investments that are not rooted in the right to food, a community-led approach and sustainable development.

FIAN International calls for:

  • An immediate end to the financing of corporate agribusiness operations and speculative investments by public development banks. 
  • The creation of fully public and accountable funding mechanisms that support peoples' efforts to build food sovereignty, realize the human right to food, protect and restore ecosystems, and address the climate emergency.
  • implementation of strong and effective mechanisms that provide communities with access to justice in case of adverse human rights impacts or social and environmental damages caused by PDB investments.