You are here: Home → CASES → URGENT ACTIONS → Stop Land Grabbing Immediately!

Stop Land Grabbing Immediately!

Beginning of Action: 07-04-2010 - End of Action: 19-05-2010

Do not support the principles of "responsible" agribusiness investment promoted by the World Bank


Land grabbing denies land for local communities, destroys livelihoods, reduces the political space for peasant oriented agricultural policies and distorts markets towards increasingly concentrated agribusiness interests and global trade, rather than sustainable peasant agriculture for local and national markets and for future generations. It will also accelerate eco-system destruction and the climate crisis. Therefore, land grabbing violates human rights. Nevertheless The World Bank, through creating voluntary principles on responsible agricultural investment tries to avoid the necessary prohibition of land grabbing by creating the illusion that these principles would prevent the disastrous consequences mentioned.

Please send letters to your government requesting it to immediately stop any support to land grabbing and to the World Banks principles. Ask your government to promote the implementation of the final declaration of the International Conference on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (ICARRD) and the recommendations made by the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD) instead.

Please copy and paste the letter below and send it by e-mail, fax or mail to your country´s Prime Minister/President and World Bank Governor (usually the Finance Minister). A list with country WB governors can be found here: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/BODINT/Resources/278027-1215526322295/BankGovernors.pdf)

Please inform FIAN about any response to your letters.

Background

In response to the new wave of land grabbing, through which state and private investors, including large banks, investment funds and agribusiness corporations are leasing or buying up tens of millions of hectares of good farmland in Asia, Africa and Latin America for food and fuel production, the World Bank (WB) is promoting a set of seven principles to make these investments "succeed". The FAO, IFAD and UNCTAD have agreed to join the WB in collectively pushing these principles. Their starting point is the fact that the current rush of private sector interest to buy up farmland is risky. After all, the WB has just finalised a study showing the magnitude of this trend and its central focus on transferring rights over agricultural land in developing countries to foreign investors. The WB seems convinced, however, that any private capital flows to expand global agribusiness is good and must be allowed to proceed so that the corporate sector can extract more wealth from the countryside. Since these investment deals are hinged on a massive privatisation and transfer of rights to land, the WB wants them to meet a few criteria to reduce the risks of social backlash - and to diffuse the irritation of the media and public in the North: The land grabbing should respect the rights of existing users of land, water and other resources (by paying them off), protect and improve livelihoods at the household and community level (provide jobs and social services), and do no harm to the environment. These are the core ideas behind the WB's seven principles for socially acceptable land grabbing.

These principles will not accomplish their ostensible objectives. The principles are rather a move trying to legitimize land grabbing. The central issue is that there is a global food crisis with over a billion people now going hungry, the vast majority of them being food producers. The real question is therefore: What kind of farming and food systems will feed people at a price they can afford, in a way that won't make them sick and that will give farmers a proper income and dignified livelihood and conserve soils and biodiversity for future generations? The answers to these questions have been given years ago by farmers' organizations, agricultural scientists, IAASTD1 and by other scientific evidence. These answers have been discarded by vested interests because they do not fit into the paradigm of agribusiness and investment funds. In the past decades support to people's agriculture was dismantled in the context of "structural adjustment" and "development cooperation". Trying to establish foreign control of people's farmlands in the name of productivity (no matter for whom) is completely unacceptable no matter under which "guidelines". The World Bank principles which intend to be voluntary and self-regulatory for the private sector try to distract from the fact that what is needed is mandatory and strict state regulation of investors in several policy fields like financial markets, investment, agriculture in order to overcome the multiple crises generated by the very same vested interests in the field of food, agricultural sustainability and climate.

1 This report, produced by 400 scientists after five years of work, came to the conclusion that a drastic policy reform is necessary in order to fight hunger and establish sustainable development - a policy reform geared to the needs and rights of peasants. The IASSTD was supported by several UN organizations and has meanwhile been approved and signed by 58 governments.

The mandate of the Emergency Network

With land grabbing the globalisation paradigm has reached the primary sector of national economies, sectors which are absolutely essential for countries' and peoples' self-determination and food sovereignty. Land grabbing fits well in a strategy towards deepening the commoditization of nature, agriculture and the global rule of a small group of "investors" and their TNCs. The corporate food regime is undermining in a systemic way the realization of the right to adequate food  of peasants in food insecure countries, and of all of us, too. An equitable access to land and resources as precondition for a decentralized, sustainable and autonomous peasant agriculture need to be defended as a crucial component of the right to adequate food.

FIAN Urgent Action 1002WB

Original Letter:

Dear Mr/Ms,

The FAO estimates that in the last three years 20 million hectares have been acquired by foreign interests in Africa only. A global process is underway whereby powerful foreign private and public investors conclude agreements with states for taking possession of and/or controlling large surfaces of land (many involving more than 10,000 hectares and several more than 500,000 hectares), which are relevant for current and/or future food security of the host country.

These large-scale land acquisition deals, most commonly known as land grabbing, will have a severe impact on the enjoyment of human rights of the local population, particularly on their right to adequate food. Land grabbing - even where there are no related forced evictions - denies land for local communities, destroys livelihoods, reduces the political space for peasant oriented agricultural policies and distorts markets towards increasingly concentrated agribusiness interests and global trade, rather than sustainable peasant agriculture for local and national markets and for future generations. Since foreign land acquisition is profit-oriented and largely for exports, it will foster the introduction/deepening of an industrial agricultural mode of production in the host countries. This mode of production will accelerate eco-system destruction and the climate crisis. Promoting or permitting land grabbing, therefore, violates the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. It also undermines the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

In response to the new wave of land grabbing, the World Bank has recently finished a study on large-scale land acquisition for agriculture in 20 countries and at the same time is promoting, in collaboration with FAO, IFAD and UNCTAD, a set of principles to guide its own operations and the responses from governments and other actors to large-scale land acquisition. Given the low levels of investment in agriculture, particularly in Africa, they argue that any investment-public or private-in lower income countries and rural areas is desirable in principle and that adherence to certain standards can make these deals a "win-win" opportunity for local people.

These principles will not accomplish their ostensible objectives. They are rather trying to   legitimize land grabbing. Facilitating the long-term foreign takeover of rural people's farmlands is completely unacceptable no matter which guidelines are followed. The WB's principles, which would be entirely voluntary, aim to distract from the fact that what is needed is radically new and effective regulation of investment in response to the global financial, food and climate crises.

What needs to be done is well-known: Broaden the economic base to produce food of  peasants, landless groups and indigenous communities by facilitating a secure access to sufficient land and water ressources as well as to fair credits and markets. Substantially invest in agro-ecological peasant farming, combining modern and traditional knowledge on sustainable agricultural systems. The input needed to improve the modes of production yields, however, needs a very different type of investment: Less in terms of capital-intensive inputs, and more in terms of knowledge, skills. What is needed is capacity-building and training to introduce resource conserving and production enhancing technologies under the control of local communities.

As a person internationally committed to the implementation of human rights, I would like to ask you to urgently:

- Take the measures within your sphere of competence and influence to immediately stop land grabbing;
- Deny the WB principles on responsible agroenterprise investment and support;
- Take the measures within your sphere of competence and influence to implement the recommendations of the International Conference on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (ICARRD) and the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD).

Please keep me informed about the measures you take in this regard.

Yours sincerely,

Translated Letter:

Open translated letter Open translated Letter
Open translated letter Close translated Letter

Estimado señor o señora:

La FAO estima que durante los últimos 3 años, 20 millones de hectáreas, sólo en Africa, han sido adquiridas por intereses extranjeros. Se ha puesto en marcha un proceso global en el cual inversionistas extranjeros públicos o privados llegan a acuerdos con los gobiernos para controlar terrenos extensos (muchos de estos acuerdos engloban más de 10.000 hectáreas y otros llegan a más de 500.000 hectáreas), los cuales son imprescindibles para la futura seguridad alimentaria de los países en cuestión. Estos acuerdos de adquisición de tierras a gran escala, más conocidos como acaparamiento de tierras, tendrán un impacto severo en los derechos humanos de la población local, sobre todo en el derecho a una alimentación adecuada. El acaparamiento de tierra - aún cuando no conlleva desalojos forzosos - niega la tierra a las comunidades locales, destruye sus medios de subsistencia, reduce el espacio de las políticas agrícolas que benefician a los/as campesinos/as, destruye los ecosistemas, acelera el calentamiento global y distorsiona el mercado favoreciendo intereses cada vez mas concentrados de la agroindustria y el mercado global, en vez de apoyar la agricultura sostenible de los/as campesinos/as para mercados regionales y locales y para las generaciones futuras. Por lo tanto, promover o permitir el acaparamiento de tierra viola el Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales. Además, tampoco respeta la Declaración de la ONU sobre los Derechos de los Pueblos Indígenas.

Como respuesta al aumento reciente en la acaparamiento de tierras, el Banco Mundial recientemente ha acabado un estudio sobre la adquisición de tierras agrícolas a gran escala en 20 países y a la vez está promoviendo, en conjunto con la FAO, FIDA y UNCTAD, unos principios que guiarán sus propias operaciones y las reacciones de los gobiernos y otros implicados en la adquisición de tierras a gran escala. Dado el nivel bajo de inversiones en la agricultura, particularmente en Africa, se argumenta que cualquier inversión - pública o privada - en países de rentas bajas y zonas rurales es positiva en principio y que el cumplimiento de ciertos estándares harán de estos acuerdos una oportunidad seguramente beneficioso para la población local.

Estos principios no cumplirán sus objetivos aparentes. En realidad intentan legitimar el acaparamiento de tierras. Facilitar el control extranjero a largo plazo de las tierras de cultivo de las comunidades rurales es totalmente inaceptable sin importar qué normas se sigan. Los principios del Banco Mundial, que son de seguimiento voluntario para el sector privado, pretenden distraer del hecho de que lo imprescindible en este momento son políticas públicas radicalmente nuevas, obligatorias y efectivas que regulen diversos ámbitos de la inversión, el mercado financiero y la agricultura para poder superar las múltiples crisis que generan estos intereses creados en la alimentación, la sostenibilidad agrícola y el clima.

Los pasos a seguir son bien conocidos: Aumentar las bases económicas de campesino/as, sin tierra y comunidades indígenas asegurándoles acceso seguro y suficiente a la tierra, el agua, créditos y mercados locales para que puedan producir alimentos. Invertir substancialmente en agricultura ecológica para el campesinado, combinando conocimientos modernos y tradicionales sobre sistemas agrícolas sostenibles. Para mejorar el rendimiento de los cultivos hace falta otro tipo de inversión muy distinto: menos aportaciones de capitales, y más  conocimiento, información y técnicas. Se necesita más capacitación y formación sobre la conservación de recursos y el uso de tecnologías que mejoren la producción bajo el control de las comunidades locales.

Como una persona dedicada al nivel internacional al respeto de los derechos humanos, quisiera rogarle urgentemente que:

- Tome medidas en su esfera de influencia para parar inmediatamente el acaparamiento de tierras.
- Rechace los principios  del Banco Mundial sobre las inversiones agrícolas responsables.
- Tome medidas en su esfera de influencia para llevar a cabo las recomendaciones de la Conferencia Internacional sobre Reforma Agraria y Desarrolla Rural (CIRADR) y las recomendaciones de la Evaluación Internacional del Papel del Conocimiento, la Ciencia y la Tecnología en el Desarrollo Agrícola (IAASTD).

Por favor, manténgame informado/a sobre las medidas que usted tome al respecto.


Atentamente,


Recipients: